Glad we're getting some standards here...some of the facebook things were getting out of control...some questions (You may not care about the past but I'll likely take down a couple of pics. Most ironically come from the fully clothed section.
1 With regards to Race and hate...Slurs are obviously a no no, but what about allusions to race class distinctions of the past. I ask this as I have a photoset (I can PM you one image from it) from a porn site which lends itself to a set with some racially charged overtones...it would be along the lines of this past image of mine
http://hypnopics-collective.net/cpg132/displayimage.php?pos=-146164 where a black seeking mobility is enslaved based on ummm...past assumption of roles...It would not come without a warning just like the above did which would include a notice that it would be removed without some amount of votes for approval (same as when I post incest)
2. I hope the hate rule doesn't extend to political posts, because...no...that's the line to me. MC and Politics are neighbors fetish wise to me...what is a good MCer without taking over the world.
3. With regards to public vs private...what about places like Model Mayhem or acid cow, where they may be public pictures but of non models (Namely i have a stash of NFL Cheer tryout pics which im not sure would be considered private, they're from the press, but they're not of professionals. At least not yet.) I guess what im asking is are we now going to strictly porn sites and professional photos?
4. Ditto if not double for nightclub pictures. Will that count as public or private? (Obviously im talking about images taken by the nightclub and otherwise posted on accounts not staged porn sex parties done by all known porn outlets
)
The short form of 3 and 4 is, is google fair game or is google now only good for celebs known public figures.
